Attorneys Fees, Costs and Travel
Expenses
Antunez-Fernandes v. Connors-Fernandes, 259 F.Supp.2d 800 (N. D. Iowa
2003) [France]
Avendano v Smith, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 3702401 (D.N.M.)
[Mexico] [Rights of Custody] [Patria potestas] [Grave Risk of Harm ] [Attorneys fees]
Berendsen v
Nichols, 938 F.Supp. 737 (D. Kan., 1996)
Cuellar v Joyce, 603 F.3d
1142, 10 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5642 (9th Cir 2010) [Panama]
Distler v Distler, 26 F.Supp.2d
723 (D. New Jersey, 1998) [Israel]
Flynn v Boarders, 2007 WL 862548 (M. D. Kentucky) [Ireland]
Frier v. Frier, 985 F.Supp.2d 710 (E. D. Mich. 1997)
[Israel]
Lakeman v Weed, 2011 WL 824588 (D.Minn.) [Canada]
Norinder v Fuentes, --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 3966153 (7th
Cir.(Ill.))[Sweden]
Ponce v Sanchez,
2011 WL 6820332 (D.Colo.) [Mexico] [Attorney Fees]
Rydder v Rydder,
49 F.3d 369 (8th Cir.,1995) [Poland]
Slagenweit v. Slagenweit, 63 F.3d 719 (8th Cir. 1995)
[Germany]
Whallon v.
Lynn, 356 F.3d 138 (1st Cir.,2004) [Poland]
Go To Top of Page
Availability of Hague Convention as a Remedy
Matter of Mohsen, 715 F. Supp. 1063 (D. Wyo. 1989)
[Bahrain]
Mezo v. Elmergawi, 855 F. Supp. 59 (E. D. N. Y. 1994 [Egypt/Libya]
Suarez v Castrillo, 2011 WL 2669198 (D.Colo.)
[Venezuela]
Taveras v. Taveras, 397 F. Supp. 908, (S.D. Ohio, 2005)
[Dominican Republic]
Tavaras v Tavaras,
477 F.3d 767 (Sixth Cir., 2006) [Dominican Republic]
Viteri v
Pflucker, 550 F.Supp.2d 829 (ND Illinois 2008) [Peru]
Wiezel v. Wiezel-Tyranauer,
385 F.Supp.2d 240 (S. D. N. Y., 2005) (S. D. N. Y.)
[Israel]
Go To Top of Page
Defenses
Anderson v. Acree, 250 F.Supp.2d 876 (S.D. Ohio
2002) [New Zealand] [Wishes of Child]
Antunez-Fernandes v. Connors-Fernandes, 259
F.Supp.2d 800 (N. D. Iowa 2003) [France] [Consent and
Acquiescence]
Baran v Beaty,
479 F.Supp.2d 1257 (S.D. Alabama, 2007)
[Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Baran v Beaty,
526 F.3d 1340 (11th Cir. (Ala.)) [Australia]
[Grave Risk of Harm]
Baxter v. Baxter, 324 F.Supp.2d 536 (D.
Delaware, 2004) [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Baxter v. Baxter,
423 F.3d 363 (3rd Cir., 2005) [Australia] [Grave Risk
of Harm]
Belay v Getachew, 272 F.Supp.2d 553,(D. Md.
2003) [Sweden] [Well-Settled in New Environment]
Blondin v. Dubois,
19 F. Supp. 2d 123 (S. D. N. Y. 1998), judgment vacated,
189 F.3d
240 (2d Cir. 1999) 78 F. Supp. 2d 283, 288-93 (S. D. N. Y. 2000) ("Blondin
III"), 238 F.3d 153 (2nd Cir. (N.Y.) 2001) ("Blondin IV")
[France] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Wishes of the Child]
Bocquet v Ouzid, 225 F.Supp.2d 1337 (2003)
[France] [Well-Settled in New Environment]
Carrascosa v Mcguire,
520 F.3d 249 (3d Cir. 2008)
[Spain] [Fundamental Freedom]
Castillo v Castillo, 597 F.Supp.2d 432 (D. Delaware, 2009) [Colombia]
[Well-Settled in New Environment] [Wishes of Child]
Charalambous v Charalambous, --- F.3d ----, 2010 WL 4963063 (1st Cir.(Me.)) [Cyprus] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Choi v. Kim,
404 F. Supp. 495 (S. D. N. Y., 2005) [Canada] [Consent and
Acquiescence]
Cuellar v Joyce,
596 F.3d 505
(9th Cir. (Mont.)) [Panama] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Consent]
Currier v. Currier, 845 F. Supp. 916
(D.N.H.1994) [Germany] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Dalsgaard v Montoya, 2011 WL 5037223 (M.D.Fla.)
[Denmark] [Habitual Residence] [Wishes of the child defense]
Danipour v. McLarey, 286 F.3d 1 (1st Cir., 2002)
[Sweden] [Grave Risk of Harm]
DeSilva v Pitts, 481 F.3d 1279 (10th Cir.2007)
[Canada] [Wishes of child]
De Vasconcelos v De Paula Batista, 2011 WL 806096 (E.D.Tex.) [Brazil] [Rights of Custody] [well settled] [age and maturity]
Didur v Viger, 392 F.Supp.2d 1268 (D.
Kansas, 2005) [Canada] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Didur v Viger, (10th Cir. 2006) No. 05-3440 D.C. No.
05-CV-2188-JWL) [Canada] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Duarte v Bardales,
526 F.3d 563 (9th Cir. 2008) [Ecuador] [Equitable
Tolling]
Elyashiv v. Elyashiv, 353 F.Supp.2d 394 (E.D.N.Y., 2005) [Isreal]
[Grave Risk of Harm]
England v. England, 234 F.3d 268 (5th Cir. 2000)
[Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Falk v Sinclair, 692
F.Supp.2d 147 (D. Maine., 2010) [Germany] [One year Statute of
Limitations] [Wishes of the Child]
Flynn v.
Borders, 472 F.Supp.2d 906 ( E.D. Ky. 2007)
[Ireland] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Foster v Foster, 654 F.
Supp 2d 348 (W. D. Pennsylvania, 2009)[Canada] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Friedrich v. Friedrich, 78
F.3d 1060 (6th Cir. 1996) [Germany] [Grave
Risk of Harm]
Freier v. Freier, 969 F. Supp. 436, 443
(E.D.Mich.1996) [Israel] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Furnes v Reeves, 362 F.3d 702 (11th
Cir., 2004) [Norway] [One year limitations]
Application of Garcia v Varona--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 3805778 (N.D.Ga.)
[Spain] [Rights of custody] [Patria potestas ] [Consent] [Abandonment]
Gonzalez-Caballero v. Mena, 251 F.3d
789 (9th Cir., Ariz., 2001) [Panama] [Consent]
Habrzyk v Habrzyk, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 1331674 (N.D.Ill.) [Poland] [Well-Settled] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Haimdas v Haimdas,
--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2010 WL 2342377 (E.D.N.Y.)
[England] [Rights of Custody] [Wishes of The Child]
Hazbun Escaf v. Rodriquez, 200 F.Supp.2d 603 (E. D.
Va.
2002) [Colombia] [Grave Risk of Harm]
In re B. Del C.S.B., 525 F. Supp.2d 1182 (C.D.
California, 2008) [Mexico] [Well Settled in New Environment]
In re Koc, 181 F.Supp.2d 136 (E.D. N.Y. 2001)
[Poland] [Well Settled in New Environment]
In re Robinson, 983 F. Supp. 1339 (D. Colo. 1997)
[United Kingdom] [Well Settled in New Environment] Karpenko v Leendertz, ---
F.3d ----, 2010 WL 3326131 (3rd Cir. (Pa.) 2010) [Netherlands] [Unclean
hands]
Kufner v Kufner, 440 F.Supp.2d 491 (D.R.I., 2007)
[Germany] [Grave Risk of Harm [Wishes of Child]
Kufner v Kufner,
519 F.3d 533 (1st Cir. 2008) [Germany]
[Grave Risk of Harm [Wishes of Child]
Matter of Lieberman v Tabachnik,
625 F.Supp.2d 1109 (D. Colorado 2009)
[Mexico] [Rights of Custody][Wishes of the Child]
Muhlemkamp v Blizzard, 521 F Supp 2d 1140 (E.D. Washington) [Germany] [Well Settled in New Environment] [Full Faith and Credit] [Temporary Custody]
In
re Application of Lozano, 2011 WL 3667444 (S.D.N.Y.) [United
Kingdom] [Well-Settled in New Environment]
Ly v. Heu, 296 F.Supp.2d
1009 (D. Minn. 2003) [France] [Well Settled in New Environment]
Locicero v. Lurashi,
321 F. Supp. 2d 295 (D.
Puerto Rico, 2004) [Argentina] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Lockhart v Smith, 2011 WL 4402361 (D.Me.) [Canada] [Wishes of
the Child]
Lopez v. Alcala, 547 F.Supp.2d
1255 (M. D. Fla. 2008) [Mexico] [Well-Settled] [Immigration Status]
Lynch v Mendez Lynch, 220 F. Supp.2d 1347, (
M.D. Florida, 2002) [Argentina] [Well Settled in New
Environment]
March v Levine, 136 F. Supp.2d 831, (M.D.
Tennessee,2000) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Miller v. Miller, 240 F.3d 392 (4th Cir. 2001)
[Canada]
Mozes v. Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2001)
[Israel] [Well Settled in New Environment]
Ngassa v Mpafe,
488 F.Supp.2d 514 (D. Maryland, 2007) [Italy]
[Grave Risk of Harm]
Neves v Neves,
637 F. Supp 2d 322 (W.D. North Carolina, 2009) [Germany][Grave
Risk of Harm][Attorneys Fees]
Nunez-Escudero v. Tice-Menley, 58 F.3d 374 (8th
Cir.1995) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Pesin v
Osorio Rodriguez, 77 F.Supp.2d 1277 ( S.D. Florida, 1999)
[Venezuela] [consent and Acquiescence]
Pesin v. Rodriguez, 244
F.3d 1250 (11th Cir. 2001) [Venezuela] [Acquiescence] [Fugitive
Disentitlement]
People ex rel. Ron v. Levi, 719 N.Y.S.2d 365
(App. Div. 2001) [Israel]
Philippopoulos, v. Philippopoulou, 461 F.Supp.2d 1321 ( N.D.
Georgia, 2006) [Greece] [Well Settled in New Environment]
Raijmakers-Eghaghe v. Haro, 131 F.Supp.2d 953 (E. D. Mich.
2001) [Netherlands] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Roche v Hartz, 2011 WL 841556 (N.D.Ohio) [Australia] [One Year Statute of Limitations]
Rowe v Vargason,
2011 WL 4529341 (D. Minn.) [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Well
Settled in New Environment] [Conditional order]
Rydder v Rydder, 49 F.3d 369 (8th
Cir.,1995) [Poland] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Silverman v Silverman, 338 F.3d 886 (8th
Cir, 2003) [Israel] [ Grave Risk of Harm]
Simcox v Simcox,
511 F.3d 594 (C.A.6 (Ohio)) [Mexico] [Grave Risk
of Harm] [Undertakings]
Trundig v
Trundig, 686 F.Supp.2d 570 ( M.D. North Carolina, 2010) [Germany]
[Wishes of the Child]
Tsarbopoulos v Tsarbopoulos, 176 F.Supp.2d 1045
(E. D.
Washington, 2001) [Greece] [Grave Risk of Harm]
State ex rel Geiser v Valentine, 11/16/2007 NYLJ 30, (col. 3) (Sup. Ct,
Richmond Co., Minardo, J.)
[Switzerland] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Steffen F. v. Severina P., 966 F.Supp.2d 922 (E. Ariz.
1997) [Germany] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Trundig v
Trundig, 686 F.Supp.2d 570 ( M.D. North Carolina, 2010) [Germany][Wishes
of the Child]
Van De Sande v. Van De Sande, 431 F.3d 567 (7th Cir.,
2005) [Belgium] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Van Driessche v. Ohio-Esezeoboh,466
F.Supp.2d 828 (S.D. Tex.,2006)
[Belgium] [Well Settled in New Environment]
Vasquez v Colores,---
F.3d ----, 2011 WL 3366380 (8th Cir.(Minn.)) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of
Harm] [Evidence]
Walker v Walker, 2011 WL 5008533 (N.D.Ill.)
[Australia] [Habitual Residence] [Abandonment and Consent]
In re Walsh, 31 F.Supp.2d 200 (D. Mass. 1998)
[Ireland] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Walsh v. Walsh, 221 F.3d 204 (1st Cir. 2000)
[Ireland] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Germany]
Wanninger v. Wanninger, 850 F. Supp. 78
(D. Mass, 1994) [Germany] [Consent and Acquiescence]
Whallon v. Lynn, 230, F.3d 450 (1st Cir. (Mass.)
2000)[Germany] [Consent and Acquiescence]
Wojcik v. Wojcik,
959 F.Supp.2d 413 (ED. Mich. 1997) [France] [Well Settled in New
Environment]
Yang v Tsui, 416 F.3d 199 (3d Cir.,2005) [Canada] [Wishes of Child]
Yang v Tsui,
499 F.3d
259 (3d Cir., 2007)
[Canada] [Wishes of Child]
Go To Top of Page
Effect of
Notice on the Merits of the Custody Dispute - Table of Cases in this
Section
Miller v Miller, 240 F.3d 392, (4th Cir.,2001)
[Canada]
Federal and State
Judicial Remedies, Younger Abstention, Colorado River Doctrine and
Appeals
Asvesta v Petroutsas,
580 F.3d 1000 (9th Cir 2009) [Greece] [Comity]
Barzilay v Barzilay,
536 F.3d 844 (8th Cir. 2008) [Israel] [Rule Against
Abstention]
Bekier v. Bekier, 248 F.3d 1051 (11th Cir. 2001)
[Israel] [Appeal moot after child returned]
Broda v Abarca, 2011 WL 900983 (D.Colo.) [Mexico] [Comity]
Boehm v Boehm, 2011 WL 863066 (M.D.Fla.) [Austria] [Comity]
Bromley v Bromley, 30 F.Supp.2d 857 (E. D. Pennsylvania, 1988)
[United Kingdom] [No authority to enforce rights of access]
Carnelli v Pas, 2011 WL 1983360 (D.N.J.) [United KIngdom] [Return of Child to Different Country than Habitual Residence] [Wishes of the child]
Cerit v. Cerit, 188 F.Supp.2d 1239 (D.Haw.2002)
[Turkey] [Younger abstention and Colorado River abstention]
Charalambous v Charalambous, 744 F.Supp.2d 375 (D. Maine 2010) [Cyprus] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Stay]
Charalambous v Charalambous, 744 F.Supp.2d 379 (D. Maine 2010) [Cyprus] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Stay] [Temporary Custody]
Copeland v
Copeland, 134 F3d 362 (4th Cir., 1998) [France] [Colorado River
Abstention]
Diabo
v Delisle, 500 F.Supp.2d 159 (N.D. New York, 2007) [Canada]
[Enforcement of Own Judgment]
Escaf v. Rodriquez, 191 F. Supp. 2d 685 (E. D. Va. 2002)
[Colombia] [ Younger Abstention and Colorado River Abstention not
required]
Fawcett v McRoberts, 326 F.3d 491 (4th Cir.,2003)
[Scotland] [Appeal not moot after child returned]
Fridlund v Spychaj-Fridlund, 654 FSupp 2d 634, ( E.D.
Kentucky, 2009) [Sweden] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies]
Gaudin v. Remis, 379 F.3d 631 (9th Cir. (Hawaii) Mar 11, 2002)
[Canada] [Appeal moot when petitioner moves to US]
Gonzalez-Caballero v. Mena,
251 F.3d 789 (9th Cir. (Ariz.)
2001) [Panama] [Scope of Review]
Grieve v. Tamerin, 269 F.3d 149 (2d Cir. 2001)
[Israel] [Younger Abstention]
Holder v. Holder, 305 F.3d 854 (9th Cir., 2002)
[Germany][Colorado River abstention not required]
Journe v. Journe, 911 F. Supp. 43
(Puerto Rico, 1995) [France] [Waiver of rights]
Khalip v Khalip, 2011 WL 1882514 (E.D.Mich.) [Ukraine] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Stay]
Karpenko v Leendertz, --- F.3d ----, 2010 WL 3326131
(3rd Cir. (Pa.) 2010) [Netherlands] [Unclean Hands]
Leser
v Berridge,--- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 6811035 (C.A.10 (Colo.))
[Czech Republic] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Moot]
Lops v. Lops, 140 F.3d 927 (11th
Cir. 1998)
[Germany] [Abstention not required]
Matter of Leslie v. Noble, 377 F.Supp.2d
1232 (S.D. Florida, 2005) [Belize] [Fugitive disentitlement]
Matter of Mahmoud, 1997 WL 43524 (E.D.N.Y.,
1997) [England] [Removal From State Court to Federal Court]
Morgan v. Morgan, 289 F.Supp.2d
1067 (N.D. Iowa 2003) [England] [Temporary restraining order]
Morton
v Morton, 982 F. Supp. 675 (D. Nebraska, 1997) [Germany] [Full faith
and credit" and "res judicata]
Muhlemkamp v Blizzard, 521 F Supp 2d 1140 (E.D. Washington) [Germany] [Well Settled in New Environment] [Full Faith and Credit] [Temporary Custody]
Navani v Shahani, 496 F.3d 1121 (10th Cir., 2007)
[England] [Appeal Moot After New English Custody Order]
Norinder v Fuentes, --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 3966153 (7th
Cir.(Ill.))[Sweden] [Discovery]
Ohlander v. Larson, 114 F.3d 1531 (10th Cir.1997)
[Sweden] [Error to deny motion to dismiss own petition]
Prevot v Prevot
, 59 F.3d 556 (6th Cir, 1995)
[France] [Fugitive disentitlement]
Rigby v Damant, 486 F.Supp.2d 222 (D. Mass. 2009) [Canada]
[Anti-Injunction Act]
Rigby v Damant,
486 F.3d 692 (1st Cir. 2007)
[Canada] [No Appeal from Denial of Injunction]
Rowe v Vargason,
2011 WL 4529341 (D. Minn.) [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Well
Settled in New Environment] [Conditional order]
Rowe v
Vargason, 2011 WL 6151523 (D.Minn.) [Federal and State
Judicial Remedies] [Australia]
Silverman
v. Silverman, 267 F.3d 788 (8th Cir. 2001) [Israel] [Younger
Abstention not required]
Teijeiro Fernandez v. Yeager, 121 F.Supp.2d 1118 (W. D. Mich.
2000) [Spain] [No authority to enforce rights of access]
Tucker v Ellenby, 2011 WL 5361154 (S.D.Fla.)
[Belize] [Yunger and Colorado River Abstention]
Von Kennel Gaudin v. Remis, 282 F.3d 1178 (9th Cir. 2002)
[Canada] [Appeal moot when petitioner moves to US]
In re Walsh, 53 F.Supp.2d 91 (D. Mass. 1999)
[Ireland] [Fugitive disentitlement]
Walsh v. Walsh, 221 F.3d 204 (1st Cir. 2000)
[Ireland] [Fugitive disentitlement]
Yang v Tsui, 416 F.3d 199 (3d Cir.,2005) [Canada] [Abstention]
Zajaczkowski v. Zajaczkowska, 932 F. Supp. 128 (D. Maryland)
[Poland] [Petition treated as habeas corpus]
Go To Top of Page
Habitual Residence
Application of Adan, 437 F.3d 381 (3rd Cir. 2006)
[Argentina]
Application of Falls v. Downe,
871 F.
Supp. 100 (D. Mass., 1994) [Germany]
Application of Nicholson v. Nicholson, 1997 WL 446432 (D. Kan.)
[Germany]
Application of Ponath, 829 F. Supp. 363, 367 (D. Utah 1993)
[Germany]
Arboleda v. Arenas, 311 F.Supp.2d 336 (E. D. N. Y., 2004)
[Colombia]
Armiliato v. Zaric-Armiliato, 169 F.Supp.2d 230 (S. D. N. Y.
2001) [Italy]
Barr v Barr,
2011 WL 797664 (S.D.Tex.) [United Kingdom]
Barzilay v Barzilay, 600 F.3d 912 (8th Cir 2010) [israel]
Bocquet v Ouzid, 225 F.Supp.2d 1337 (2003)
[France]
Brennan v. Cibault, 227 A.D.2d 965, 643 N.Y.S.2d 780 (4th Dept 1996)
[France]
Brosselin v Harless, 2011 WL 6130419 (W.D.Wash.)
[Habitual Residence] [France]
Bustamente v Serrano-Figueroa, 207 F.Supp.2d 1205 (D.
Colorado,, 2002) [Mexico]
Cabrera v. Lozano, 323 F.Supp.2d 1303 (S.D. Florida, 2004)
[Argentina]
David B. v. Helen O., 164 Misc. 2d 566, 625 N.Y.S.2d 436 (Fam.
Ct. 1995) [Nigeria] [United Kingdom]
David S. v. Zamira S., 151 Misc. 2d 630, 574 N.Y.S.2d 429 (Fam.
Ct. 1991) [Canada]
Deloyve v Lee, 329 F.3d 330 (3rd Cir.,2003)
[Germany]
Feder v. Evans-Feder, 63 F.3d 217 (3d Cir.1995)
[Australia]
Friedrich v.
Friedrich, 983 F.2d 1396 (6th Cir. 1993) [Germany]
Gitter v. Gitter,
396 F.3d 124 (2nd Cir.,2005)
[Israel]
Guzzo v
Cristofano, 2011 WL 6934108 (S.D.N.Y.)[Italy] [Habitual
Residence]
Hanley v Roy ,
485 F.3d
641
(11th Cir. (Fla.) 2007) [Ireland]
Holder v Holder, 392 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir. 2004)
[Germany]
In re Morris, 55 F.Supp.2d 1156 (D. Colo. 1999)
[Switzerland]
Jenkins v Jenkins, 569 F.3d 549 (6 Cir 2009) [Israel]
Johnson v Johnson, 2011 WL 569876 (S.D.N.Y.) [Italy]
Kijowska v.
Haines, 463 F.3d 583 (C.A.7 (Ill.),2006) [Poland]
Kanth v. Kanth, 79 F.Supp.2d 1317 (D. Utah 1999)
[Australia]
Karkkainen v Kovalchuk
445 F.3d 280 (3rd
Cir. (Pa.) 2006) [Finland]
Koch v Koch, 416 F.Supp.2d 645 ( E. D. Wisconsin, 2006)
[Germany]
Koch v Koch, 450 F.3d 703 (7th Cir.,2006)
[Germany]
Levesque v Levesque, 816 F. Supp. 662 (D. Kansas, 1993)
[Germany]
Lutman v
Lutman, 2010 WL 3398985 (M.D.Pa.) [Isreal] [Habitual Residence]
March v Levine, 136 F.Supp.2d 831, (M.D. Tennessee, 2000)
[Mexico]
March v. Levine, 249 F.3d 462 (6th Cir. 2001)
[Mexico]
Maxwell v Maxwell, 588 F.3d 245 (4th Cir.(N.C.) 2009)
[Australia]
Maynard v. Maynard,
484 F.Supp.2d 654, (E .D. Mich., 2007) [Australia]
Menechem v Menechem,246 F.Supp.2d
437 (D. Md.,
2003) [Israel]
McCurdy v Shreve-McCurdy, 2011 WL 1457158 (E.D.Mich.) [Canada] [Habitual Residence]
Meredith v. Meredith, 759 F. Supp. 1432, 1433 (D.Ariz.1991)
[France]
Mero v Prieto,
--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2008 WL 2331927 (E.D.N.Y.) [Mexico]
Mckenzie v McKenzie, 168 F.Supp.2d 47 (2001)
[Germany]
Miller v Miller, 240 F.3d 392, (4th Cir.,2001)
[Canada]
Mozes v Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir, 2001)
[Israel]
Nelson v Petterle, 2011 WL 1048107 (E.D.Cal.) [Iceland] [Habitual Residence]
Nicolson v Pappalardo, 674 F.Supp.2d 295, (D. Maine, 2010)
[Australia]
Nicolson v Pappalardo, ---
F.3d ----, 2010 WL 1730393 (1st Cir.(Me.))[Australia]
Norinder v Fuentes, --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 3966153 (7th
Cir.(Ill.))[Sweden] [Discovery]
Nunez-Escudero v. Tice-Menley, 58 F.3d 374 (8th Cir.1995)
[Mexico]
Ordon Ez v. Tacuri, 2009 WL 2928903 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) [Ecuador]
Pasten v Velasquez, 462 F.Supp.2d 1206 (M.D.
Alabama, 2006) [Chile]
Papakosmas v Papakosmas,
483 F.3d 617 (9th Cir.(Cal.) 2007) [Greece]
Paz v Paz, 169 F.Supp.2d 254 (S.D. New York, 2001)
[ New Zealand]
Robert v Tesson,
507 F.3d 981 (6th Cir.,
2007) [France]
Rydder v Rydder, 49 F.3d 369 (8th Cir.,1995)
[Poland]
Sasson v. Sasson, 327 F.Supp.2d 489 (D. New Jersey, 2004)
[Israel]
Seaman v Patterson, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 124223 (M.D.Ga.) [Mexico][Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody - patria potestas]
Sheikh v. Cahill, 145 Misc. 2d 171, 546 N.Y.S.2d 517 (Sup.
Ct. 1989) [Canada]
Silverman v Silverman, 338 F.3d 886 (8th Cir,
2003) [Israel]
Silvestri v Oliva, 403 F.Supp.2d 378 ( D. New Jersey, 2005)
[Argentina]
Slagenweit v. Slagenweit, 841 F. Supp. 264 (N.D. Iowa 1993),
dismissed, 43 F.3d 1476 and dismissed, 43 F.3d 1476. [Germany]
Sorenson v Sorenson, 559 F.3d 871 (8th Cir
2009)
[Australia]
Stern v Stern, --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 1706912 (8th Cir.(Iowa)) [Isreal] [Habitual Residence]
Tenorio Ruiz v Tenorio, 392 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir.)
[Mexico]
Tsarbopoulos v Tsarbopoulos, 176 F.Supp.2d 1045 (E.D.
Washington) [Greece]
Whiting v Krassner,
391 F3d 540 ( 3rd
Cir, 2004) [Canada]
Yang v Tsui, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2006
WL 2466095 (W. D. Pa)
[Canada]
Yang v Tsui, --- F.3d ----, 2007
WL 2377463 (C.A.3 (Pa.))
[Canada]
Zuker v. Andrews, 2 F.Supp.2d 134 (D. Mass. 1998)
[Argentina]
Go To Top of Page
Habitual Residence -
English Case of In re Bates
In re Bates,
High Court of Justice, No. CA 122/89, Family Division, Royal Courts
of Justice, London WC2, February 23, 1989 [United Kingdom]
Notice of Commencement
of Proceedings
Brooke v Willis,
907 F. Supp. 57 (S.D. N. Y. 1995) [United Kingdom] [ Notice of
proceedings]
Egervary v. Rooney, 80 F.Supp.2d 491 (E. D. Pa. 2000)
[Hungary]
Green v Green, NYLJ, 7-6-93, P.33, Col. 2, Sup. Ct., Kings Co.
(Rigler, J.)
Klam v. Klam, 797 F. Supp. 202 (E. D. N. Y. 1992)
[Gemany]
Rydder v Rydder, 49 F.3d 369 (8th Cir.,1995)
[Poland]
Go To Top of Page
Rights of Custody and Rights of Access
A.A.M. v. J.L.R.C.,--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 75049
(E.D.N.Y.) [Mexico] [Rights of Custody] [Patria Potestas]
Abbott v
Abbott, ---
S.Ct. ----, 2010 WL 1946730 [Chile] [Rights of Custody]
Abbott v Abbott,
495 F.Supp.2d 635 (W.D. Texas, 2007)
[Chile] [Rights of Custody]
Abbott v Abbott,
542
F.3d 1081
(5th Cir. 2008) [Chile] [Rights of
Custody]
Aguirre v Calle,
2008 WL
4461931 (E. D. N. Y.) [Colombia] [Patria Potestas Creates Rights
of Custody]
Aldinger v. Segler , 263 F.Supp.2d 284 (D. Puerto Rico)
[Germany] [Rights of Custody]
Antunez-Fernandes v. Connors-Fernandes, 259 F.Supp.2d 800 (N. D. Iowa
2003) [France] [Joint parental responsibility]
In re
Application of Adams ex rel. Naik v. Naik, 363 F.Supp.2d 1025
( N.D. Illinois, 2005) [United
Kingdom] [Rights of Custody]
Avendano v Smith, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 3702401 (D.N.M.)
[Mexico] [Rights of Custody] [Patria potestas] [Grave Risk of Harm ] [Attorneys fees]
Bader v Kramer,
445 F.3d
346 (4th Cir., 2006) ("Bader I") [Germany] [Presumption of joint custody]
Bader v
Kramer, 484 F.3d 666 (4th Cir., 2007) [Exercise Rights of
Custody]
Cantor v Cohen, 442 F.3d 196 (4th Cir. 2006)
[ Israel] [No jurisdiction to enforce rights of Access]
Croll v. Croll, 229 F.3d 133 (2d Cir.2000)
[Hong Kong] [Ne exeat not right of custody]
Doudle v. Gause, 282 F.Supp.2d 922 (N. D. Ind. 2003)
[Austria] [Rights of Custody]
Duran v Beaumont,
542
F.3d 1081, 2008 WL 2780656 (2nd Cir. (N.Y.)) [Chile] Ne Exeat Not Right of Custody] [Can enforce
Rights of Access
Furnes v Reeves, 362 F.3d 702 (11th Cir., 2004)
[Norway]
[ne exeat right of custody]
Garcia v Angarita, 440
F.Supp.2d 1364 (S.D. Florida, 2006) [Colombia] [patria potestas right of custody]
Application of Garcia v Varona--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 3805778 (N.D.Ga.)
[Spain] [Rights of custody] [Patria potestas ] [Consent] [Abandonment]
Giampaolo v. Erneta, 390 F.Supp.2d 1269 (N.D. Georgia, 2004)
[Argentina]
[Rights of Custody]
Gil v. Rodriguez, 184 F.Supp.2d 1221,
(M.D. Florida, 2002) [Venezuela] [patria potestas right of
custody]
Gonzalez v. Gutierrez, 311 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2002)
[Mexico]
[Ne exeat not right of custody]
Hazbun Escaf v. Rodriquez, 200 F.Supp.2d 603 (E. D. Va. 2002)
[Colombia] [Rights of custody]
Hanley v Roy ,
485 F.3d
641
(11th Cir. (Fla.) 2007)
[Ireland] [Rights of Custody]
Ibarra v Quintanilla
Garcia,
476 F.Supp.2d 630 (S. D. Texas, 2007)
[Mexico] [Rights of Custody]
In re DD, 440 F.Supp.2d 1283 (M.D.
Florida,2006) [France] [Rights of Custody]
In re Polson, 578 F.Supp.2d 1064 (S. D. Ill. 2008)
[Australia]
In re Robinson, 983 F. Supp. 1339 (D. Colo. 1997)
[United Kingdom] [Rights of Custody]
Judge v Williams, 2011 WL 3100346 (E.D.N.C.)
[Ireland] [Rights of Custody]
Krefter v Willis, 623 F.Supp.2d 125 (D. Mass. 2009)
{Germany] [Rights of Custody]
Kufner v Kufner, 440 F.Supp.2d 491 (D.R.I., 2007)
[Germany] [Rights of Custody]
Lalo v. Malca, 318 F.Supp.2d 1152 (S.D., Florida, 2004)
[Panama] [ne exeat right of custody] [patria potestas right
of custody]
Ly v Heu, 296 F.Supp.2d 1009 ( D. Minnesota, 2003)
[France ] [No jurisdiction to enforce right of access]
Lynch v Mendez Lynch, 220 F.Supp.2d 1347, ( M.D. Florida,
2002)
[Argentina] [Rights of custody]
Matter of Leslie v. Noble, 377 F.Supp.2d
1232 (S.D. Florida, 2005) [Belize] [Rights of Custody]
Norden-Powers v. Beveridge, 125 F.Supp.2d 634 (E. D. N. Y. 2000)
[Australia] [Joint parental responsibility]
Ortiz v Cantu,
2009 WL 8543610 (S.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Rights of custody] [Patria
Postestas]
Pasten v Velasquez, 462 F.Supp.2d 1206 (M.D.
Alabama, 2006)
[Chile] [Rights of custody]
Pesin v Osorio Rodriguez, 77 F.Supp.2d 1277 ( S.D. Florida,
1999)
[Venezuela] [Rights of Custody]
Pesin v. Rodriguez,
244 F.3d 1250 (11th Cir. 2001) [Venezuela] [Fugitive disentitlement]
Pielage v McConnell,
516
F.3d 1282
(11th Cir. 2008) (11th Cir. 2008)
[Netherlands] [Retention defined]
Radu v
Toader, 2011 WL 3418368 (E.D.N.Y.) [Romania] [Rights of
Custody] [Ne Exeat Rights]
Roy v Roy, 432 F.Supp.2d 1297 (S.D. Florida, 2006)
[Ireland] [Rights of Custody]
Sealed Appellant v Sealed Appellee
394 F.3d 338
(5th Cir. (Tex.) 2004) [Australia] [Rights of
custody]
Shalit v. Coppe,
182 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir., 1999) [Israel] [Rights of
custody]
Shealy v. Shealy, 295 F.3d 1117 (10th Cir., 2002)
[Germany] [Equal de jure custody]
Teijeiro Fernandez v. Yeager, 121 F.Supp.2d 1118 (W. D. Mich.
2000) [Spain] [No jurisdiction to enforce right of
access]
Vale v. Avila,
2008 U.S. App. Lexis 17068 (7 Cir. 2008) [Venezuela] [Patria Posestas
and Ne Exeat Right Creates Right of Custody]
Walton v. Walton, 925 F. Supp. 453 (S.D.
Miss., 1996) [Australia] [Rights of custody]
Whallon v. Lynn,
230 F.3d 450 (1st Cir. 2000)
[Mexico]
[patria potestas right of custody]
Wiezel v Wiezel-Tyrnauer
385 F.Supp.2d 240 (S. D. N. Y., 2005)
[No jurisdiction to enforce right of access]
Wiggill v Janicki, 262 F.Supp.2d 687 ( S.D. West Virginia,
2003) [England] [No jurisdiction to enforce
right of access]
Wojcik v. Wojcik, 959 F.Supp.2d 413 (ED. Mich. 1997)
[France] [joint custody presumption]
Yang v Tsui,
416 F.3d 199 (3d Cir.,2005) [Canada]
Yang v Tsui,
499 F.3d 259 (3d Cir., 2007) [Canada] [Rights of Custody]
Go To Top of Page
Wrongful Removal or Retention
Belay v Getachew, 272 F.Supp.2d 553,(D. Md.,
2003) [Sweden]
Diorinou v. Mezitis, 237 F.3d 133 (2d Cir.,
2001) [Greece]
Fabri v. Pritikin-Fabri, 221 F. Supp. 2d 859
(N.D. Ill. 2001) [Italy]
Mozes v Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067 (9th
Cir, 2001)
[Israel]
Shealy v. Shealy, 295 F.3d 1117 (10th Cir. 2002)
[Germany]
Toren v. Toren, 191 F.3d 23 (1st
Cir. 1999)
[Israel]
Go To Top of Page
|
