"child custody" "child support" New York Family Law"

 

 

 

    [HOME]

                  New York Divorce and Family Law  

      nysdivorce.com    brandeslaw.com

The definitive site on the web for New York Divorce and Family Law.

 

[HOME]

NEW YORK DIVORCE AND FAMILY LAW 

 

[SITE MAP]

ARTICLES  BY SUBJECT

Adoption

Agreements

Alimony, Maintenance and Spousal Support

Child Abuse

Child Abduction

Child Custody and Parental Alienation

Child Support

Child Visitation

Common Law Marriage

Domestic Violence

Degrees and Licenses

Engagement Gifts

Enforcement

Grandparent Visitation and Non-Parent Visitation

Grounds For Divorce

International Child Abduction

Legal Fee Awards and Awards For Expenses

Litigation and Procedure

Marital Property

Property Distribution

Questions About Taxes

Retirement Benefits

Separate Property

Spousal Support

Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act

[HOME]

[SITE MAP]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[ Home | News | Feedback | Search ]

Table of Reported Cases Arranged By Country and Subject Matter - Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction


Go to Alphabetical Table

Go Back to  Main Menu Library of All Federal Cases and New York State Cases - Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction

Go to Library of  Unreported Federal Cases decided under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction

Visit Florida Divorce and Family Law

 

Attorneys Fees, Costs and Travel Expenses

Aldinger v Segler, 157 Fed. Appx. 317 (1st Cir.,2005) [Not for Publication in Federal Reporter] [Germany]

Antunez-Fernandes v. Connors-Fernandes, 259 F.Supp.2d 800 (N. D. Iowa 2003) [France]

Berendsen v Nichols, 938 F.Supp. 737 (D. Kan., 1996)

Distler v Distler, 26 F.Supp.2d 723 (D. New Jersey, 1998) [Israel]

Frier v. Frier, 985 F.Supp.2d 710 (E. D. Mich. 1997)  [Israel]

Rydder v Rydder, 49 F.3d 369 (8th Cir.,1995) [Poland]

Slagenweit v. Slagenweit, 63 F.3d 719 (8th Cir. 1995) [Germany]

Whallon v. Lynn, 356 F.3d 138 (1st Cir.,2004) [Poland]


Availability of Hague Convention as a Remedy

Matter of Mohsen, 715 F. Supp. 1063 (D. Wyo. 1989) [Bahrain]

Mezo v. Elmergawi, 855 F. Supp. 59 (E. D. N. Y. 1994[Egypt/Libya]

Taveras v. Taveras
,  397 F. Supp. 908, (S.D. Ohio, 2005)  [Santo Domingo]

Tavaras v Tavaras, 477 F.3d 767 (Sixth Cir., 2006)

Wiezel v. Wiezel-Tyranauer, 385 F.Supp.2d 240 (S. D. N. Y., 2005) (S. D. N. Y.) [Israel]

Go To Top of Page


Defenses

Anderson v. Acree, 250 F.Supp.2d 876 (S.D. Ohio 2002) [New Zealand] [Wishes of Child]

Antunez-Fernandes v. Connors-Fernandes, 259 F.Supp.2d 800 (N. D. Iowa 2003) [France] [Consent]

Baran v Beaty, 479 F.Supp.2d 1257 (S.D. Alabama, 2007) [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Baxter v. Baxter, 324 F.Supp.2d 536 (D. Delaware, 2004) [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Baxter v. Baxter, 423 F.3d  363  (3rd Cir., 2005)  [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Belay v Getachew, 272 F.Supp.2d 553,(D. Md. 2003)  [Sweden]

Blondin v. Dubois, 19 F. Supp. 2d 123 (S. D. N. Y. 1998), judgment vacated, 189 F.3d 240 (2d Cir. 1999) 78 F. Supp. 2d 283, 288-93 (S. D. N. Y. 2000) ("Blondin III"), 238 F.3d 153 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) 2001) ("Blondin IV")  [France] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Bocquet v Ouzid, 225 F.Supp.2d 1337 (2003)  [France] [Settled in new environment]

Carrascosa v Mcguire, 520 F.3d 249 (3d Cir. 2008) [Spain] [Fundamental Freedom]

Choi v. Kim, 404 F. Supp. 495 (S. D. N. Y., 2005) [Canada] [Consent]

Currier v. Currier, 845 F. Supp. 916 (D.N.H.1994) [Germany] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Danipour v. McLarey, 286 F.3d 1 (1st Cir., 2002) [Sweden] [Grave Risk of Harm]

DeSilva v Pitts, 481 F.3d 1279 (10th Cir.2007)   [Canada] [Wishes of child]

Didur v Viger, 392 F.Supp.2d 1268 (D. Kansas, 2005) [Canada] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Didur v Viger, (10th Cir. 2006) No. 05-3440 D.C. No. 05-CV-2188-JWL)  [Canada] [Grave Risk of Harm]

England v. England, 234 F.3d 268 (5th Cir. 2000)   [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Flynn v. Borders, 472 F.Supp.2d 906 ( E.D. Ky. 2007) [Ireland] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Friedrich v. Friedrich, 78 F.3d 1060 (6th Cir. 1996) [Germany] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Freier v. Freier, 969 F. Supp. 436, 443 (E.D.Mich.1996) [Israel] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Furnes v Reeves, 362 F.3d 702 (11th Cir., 2004) [Norway] [One year limitations]

Gonzalez-Caballero v. Mena, 251 F.3d 789 (9th Cir., Ariz., 2001) [Panama] [Consent]

Hazbun Escaf v. Rodriquez, 200 F.Supp.2d 603 (E. D. Va. 2002)  [Colombia] [Grave Risk of Harm]

In re Application of Adams ex rel. Naik v. Naik, 363 F.Supp.2d 1025 ( N.D. Illinois, 2005)  [United Kingdom] [Rights of Custody]

In re B. Del C.S.B., 525 F. Supp.2d 1182 (C.D. California, 2008) [Mexico] [Well Settled in New Environment]  

In re Koc, 181 F.Supp.2d 136 (E.D.  N.Y. 2001) [Poland] [Well Settled in New Environment]

In re Robinson, 983 F. Supp. 1339 (D. Colo. 1997)  [United Kingdom] [Well Settled in New Environment]

Kufner v Kufner, 440 F.Supp.2d 491 (D.R.I., 2007) [Germany] [Grave Risk of Harm  [Wishes of Child]

Kufner v Kufner, --- F.3d ----, 2008 WL 615506 (1st Cir. 2008) [Germany] [Grave Risk of Harm  [Wishes of Child]

Ly v. Heu, 296 F.Supp.2d 1009 (D. Minn. 2003) [France] [Well Settled in New Environment]

Locicero v. Lurashi, 321 F. Supp. 2d 295 (D. Puerto Rico, 2004)  [Argentina] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Lynch v Mendez Lynch, 220 F. Supp.2d 1347, ( M.D. Florida, 2002)  [Argentina] [Well Settled in New Environment]

March v Levine, 136 F. Supp.2d 831, (M.D. Tennessee,2000)  [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Matovski v Matovski, 2007 WL 2600862 (S.D.N.Y.) [Australia] [Well Settled in New Environment]

Miller v. Miller, 240 F.3d 392 (4th Cir. 2001)  [Canada]

Mozes v. Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2001) [Israel] [Well Settled in New Environment]

Ngassa v Mpafe, 488 F.Supp.2d 514 (D. Maryland, 2007)  [Italy] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Nunez-Escudero v. Tice-Menley, 58 F.3d 374 (8th Cir.1995)  [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Pesin v Osorio Rodriguez, 77 F.Supp.2d 1277 ( S.D. Florida, 1999) [Venezuela]  [Acquiescence]

Pesin v. Rodriguez, 244 F.3d 1250 (11th Cir. 2001) [Venezuela]  [Acquiescence] [Fugitive Disentitlement]

People ex rel. Ron v. Levi, 719 N.Y.S.2d 365 (App. Div. 2001) [Israel]

Philippopoulos, v. Philippopoulou, 461 F.Supp.2d 1321 ( N.D. Georgia, 2006) [Greece] [Well Settled in New Environment]

Raijmakers-Eghaghe v. Haro, 131 F.Supp.2d 953 (E. D. Mich. 2001) [Netherlands] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Rydder v Rydder, 49 F.3d 369 (8th Cir.,1995) [Poland]  [Grave Risk of Harm]

Silverman v Silverman, 338 F.3d 886 (8th Cir, 2003) [Israel] [ Grave Risk of Harm]

Simcox v Simcox, --- F.3d —, 2007 WL 4547728 (C.A.6 (Ohio)) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Undertakings]

Tsarbopoulos v Tsarbopoulos, 176 F.Supp.2d 1045 (E. D. Washington, 2001)  [Greece] [Grave Risk of Harm]

State ex rel Geiser v Valentine, 11/16/2007 NYLJ 30, (col. 3) (Sup. Ct, Richmond Co., Minardo, J.) [Switzerland] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Steffen F. v. Severina P., 966 F.Supp.2d 922 (E. Ariz. 1997) [Germany] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Van De Sande v. Van De Sande, 431 F.3d 567 (7th Cir., 2005) [Belgium] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Van Driessche v. Ohio-Esezeoboh,466 F.Supp.2d 828 (S.D. Tex.,2006) [Belgium] [Well Settled in New Environment]

In re Walsh, 31 F.Supp.2d 200 (D. Mass. 1998) [Ireland] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Walsh v. Walsh, 221 F.3d 204 (1st Cir. 2000)  [Ireland] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Germany]

Wanninger v. Wanninger, 850 F. Supp. 78 (D. Mass, 1994) [Germany]  [Acquiescense]

Whallon v. Lynn, 230, F.3d 450 (1st Cir. (Mass.) 2000)[Germany] [Acquiescense]

Wojcik v. Wojcik, 959 F.Supp.2d 413 (ED. Mich. 1997) [France] [Well Settled in New Environment]

Yang v Tsui, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2006 WL 2466095 (W. D. Pa) [Canada] [Wishes of Child]

Yang v Tsui, 416 F.3d 199 (3d Cir.,2005) [Canada] [Wishes of Child]

Yang v Tsui, 499 F.3d 259 (3d Cir., 2007) [Canada] [Wishes of Child]

Go To Top of Page


Effect of Notice on the Merits of the Custody Dispute - Table of Cases in this Section

Miller v Miller
, 240 F.3d 392, (4th Cir.,2001)  [Canada]

Federal and State Judicial Remedies, Younger Abstention, Colorado River Doctrine and Appeals

Bekier v. Bekier, 248 F.3d 1051 (11th Cir. 2001) [Israel] [Appeal moot after child returned]

Bromley v Bromley, 30 F.Supp.2d 857 (E. D. Pennsylvania, 1988)  [United Kingdom] [No authority to enforce rights of access]

Cerit v. Cerit, 188 F.Supp.2d 1239 (D.Haw.2002) [Turkey] [Younger abstention and Colorado River abstention]

Diabo v Delisle, 500 F.Supp.2d 159 (N.D. New York, 2007) [Canada] [Enforcement of Own Judgment]

Escaf v. Rodriquez, 191 F. Supp. 2d 685 (E. D. Va. 2002) [Colombia] [ Younger Abstention and Colorado River Abstention not required]

Ebanks v Ebanks, 2007 WL 2591196 (S.D.N.Y.) [Extension of Time to Serve Process]

Fawcett v McRoberts, 326 F.3d 491 (4th Cir.,2003) [Scotland] [Appeal not moot after child returned]

Gaudin v. Remis, 379 F.3d 631 (9th Cir. (Hawaii) Mar 11, 2002) [Canada] [Appeal moot when petitioner moves to US]

Gonzalez-Caballero v. Mena,
251 F.3d 789 (9th Cir. (Ariz.) 2001) [Panama] [Scope of Review]

Grieve v. Tamerin, 269 F.3d 149 (2d Cir. 2001) [Israel] [Younger Abstention]

Holder v. Holder, 305 F.3d 854 (9th Cir., 2002) [Germany][Colorado River abstention not required]

Journe v. Journe, 911 F. Supp. 43 (Puerto Rico, 1995) [France] [Waiver of rights]

Lops v. Lops, 140 F.3d 927 (11th Cir. 1998) [Germany] [Abstention not required]

Matter of Leslie v. Noble, 377 F.Supp.2d 1232 (S.D. Florida, 2005) [Belize] [Fugitive disentitlement]

Matter of Mahmoud, 1997 WL 43524 (E.D.N.Y., 1997) [England] [Removal From State Court to Federal Court]

Morgan v. Morgan, 289 F.Supp.2d 1067 (N.D. Iowa 2003) [England] [Temporary restraining order]

Morton v Morton, 982 F. Supp. 675 (D. Nebraska, 1997) [Germany] [Full faith and credit" and "res judicata]

Navani v Shahani, 496 F.3d 1121 (10th Cir., 2007) [England] [Appeal Moot After New English Custody Order]

Ohlander v. Larson, 114 F.3d 1531 (10th Cir.1997) [Sweden] [Error to deny motion to dismiss own petition]

Prevot v Prevot , 59 F.3d 556 (6th Cir, 1995) [France] [Fugitive disentitlement]

Silverman v. Silverman, 267 F.3d 788 (8th Cir. 2001) [Israel] [Younger Abstention not required]

Teijeiro Fernandez v. Yeager, 121 F.Supp.2d 1118 (W. D.  Mich. 2000)  [Spain] [No authority to enforce rights of access]

Von Kennel Gaudin v. Remis, 282 F.3d 1178 (9th Cir. 2002) [Canada] [Appeal moot when petitioner moves to US]

In re Walsh, 53 F.Supp.2d 91 (D. Mass. 1999) [Ireland]
  [Fugitive disentitlement]

Walsh v. Walsh, 221 F.3d 204 (1st Cir. 2000) [Ireland]  [Fugitive disentitlement]

Yang v Tsui, 416 F.3d 199 (3d Cir.,2005) [Canada] [Abstention]

Zajaczkowski v. Zajaczkowska, 932 F. Supp. 128 (D. Maryland) [Poland] [Petition treated as habeas corpus]

Go To Top of Page


Habitual Residence

Application of Adan, 437 F.3d 381 (3rd Cir. 2006) [Argentina]

Application of Falls v. Downe, 871 F. Supp. 100 (D. Mass., 1994) [Germany]

Application of Ponath, 829 F. Supp. 363, 367 (D. Utah 1993) [Germany]

Arboleda v. Arenas, 311 F.Supp.2d 336 (E. D. N. Y., 2004) [Colombia]
 
Armiliato v. Zaric-Armiliato, 169 F.Supp.2d 230 (S. D. N. Y. 2001)  [Italy]

Bocquet v Ouzid, 225 F.Supp.2d 1337 (2003) [France]

Brennan v. Cibault, 227 A.D.2d 965, 643 N.Y.S.2d 780 (4th Dept 1996)  [France]

Bustamente v Serrano-Figueroa, 207 F.Supp.2d 1205 (D. Colorado,, 2002) [Mexico]

Cabrera v. Lozano, 323 F.Supp.2d 1303 (S.D. Florida, 2004) [Argentina]

David B. v. Helen O., 164 Misc. 2d 566, 625 N.Y.S.2d 436 (Fam. Ct. 1995) [Nigeria] [United Kingdom]

David S. v. Zamira S., 151 Misc. 2d 630, 574 N.Y.S.2d 429 (Fam. Ct. 1991) [Canada]

Deloyve v Lee, 329 F.3d 330 (3rd Cir.,2003) [Germany]

Feder v. Evans-Feder, 63 F.3d 217 (3d Cir.1995) [Australia]

Friedrich v. Friedrich, 983 F.2d 1396 (6th Cir. 1993) [Germany]

Gitter v Gitter, 2003 WL 22775375 (E. D. N. Y. 2003) [Israel]

Gitter v. Gitter, 396 F.3d 124 (2nd Cir.,2005)  [Israel]

Hanley v Roy , 485 F.3d 641 (11th Cir. (Fla.) 2007) [Ireland]

Holder v Holder, 392 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir. 2004) [Germany]

In re Morris, 55 F.Supp.2d 1156 (D. Colo. 1999) [Switzerland]

Kijowska v. Haines, 463 F.3d 583 (C.A.7 (Ill.),2006) [Poland]

Kanth v. Kanth, 79 F.Supp.2d 1317 (D. Utah 1999) [Australia]

Karkkainen v Kovalchuk 445 F.3d 280 (3rd Cir. (Pa.) 2006)  [Finland]

Koch v Koch, 416 F.Supp.2d 645 ( E. D. Wisconsin, 2006) [Germany]

Koch v Koch, 450 F.3d 703 (7th Cir.,2006) [Germany]

Levesque v Levesque, 816 F. Supp. 662 (D. Kansas, 1993) [Germany]

March v Levine, 136 F.Supp.2d 831, (M.D. Tennessee, 2000) [Mexico]

March v. Levine, 249 F.3d 462 (6th Cir. 2001) [Mexico]

Maynard v. Maynard, 484 F.Supp.2d 654,  (E .D. Mich., 2007) [Australia]

Menechem v Menechem,246 F.Supp.2d 437 (D. Md., 2003) [Israel]

Meredith v. Meredith, 759 F. Supp. 1432, 1433 (D.Ariz.1991)
[France]

Mckenzie v McKenzie, 168 F.Supp.2d 47 (2001) [Germany]

Miller v Miller, 240 F.3d 392, (4th Cir.,2001) [Canada]

Mozes v Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir, 2001) [Israel]

Nunez-Escudero v. Tice-Menley, 58 F.3d 374 (8th Cir.1995) [Mexico]

Pasten v Velasquez, 462 F.Supp.2d 1206 (M.D. Alabama, 2006) [Chile]

Papakosmas v Papakosmas, 483 F.3d 617 (9th Cir.(Cal.) 2007) [Greece]

Paz v Paz, 169 F.Supp.2d 254 (S.D. New York, 2001) [ New Zealand]

Paz v. De Paz, 47 Fed. Appx. 22 (2d Cir.,2002) [not selected for publication in the Federal Reporter]

Robert v Tesson, 507 F.3d 981 (6th Cir., 2007) [France]
 
Rydder v Rydder, 49 F.3d 369 (8th Cir.,1995)  [Poland]

Sasson v. Sasson, 327 F.Supp.2d 489 (D. New Jersey, 2004) [Israel]

Sheikh v. Cahill, 145 Misc. 2d 171, 546 N.Y.S.2d 517 (Sup. Ct. 1989) [Canada]

Silverman v Silverman, 338 F.3d 886 (8th Cir, 2003) [Israel]

Silvestri v Oliva, 403 F.Supp.2d 378 ( D. New Jersey, 2005) [Argentina]

Slagenweit v. Slagenweit, 841 F. Supp. 264 (N.D. Iowa 1993), dismissed, 43 F.3d 1476 and dismissed, 43 F.3d 1476. [Germany]

Tenorio Ruiz v Tenorio, 392 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir.) [Mexico]
 
Tsarbopoulos v Tsarbopoulos, 176 F.Supp.2d 1045 (E.D. Washington)  [Greece]

Whiting v Krassner, 391 F3d 540 ( 3rd Cir, 2004) [Canada]

Yang v Tsui, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2006 WL 2466095 (W. D. Pa) [Canada]

Yang v Tsui, --- F.3d ----, 2007 WL 2377463 (C.A.3 (Pa.)) [Canada]

Zuker v. Andrews, 2 F.Supp.2d 134 (D. Mass. 1998) [Argentina]

Go To Top of Page


Habitual Residence - English Case of In re Bates

In re Bates, High Court of Justice, No. CA 122/89, Family Division, Royal Courts of Justice, London WC2, February 23, 1989 [United Kingdom]


Notice of Commencement of Proceedings

Brooke v Willis, 907 F. Supp. 57 (S.D. N. Y. 1995) [United Kingdom] [ Notice of proceedings]

Egervary v. Rooney, 80 F.Supp.2d 491 (E. D. Pa. 2000) [Hungary]

Green v Green, NYLJ, 7-6-93, P.33, Col. 2, Sup. Ct., Kings Co. (Rigler, J.)

Klam v. Klam, 797 F. Supp. 202 (E. D. N. Y. 1992) [Gemany]

Rydder v Rydder, 49 F.3d 369 (8th Cir.,1995) [Poland]


Go To Top of Page


Rights of Custody and Rights of Access

Abbott v Abbott, 495 F.Supp.2d 635 (W.D. Texas, 2007) [Chile] [Rights of Custody] 

Aldinger v. Segler, 263 F.Supp.2d 284 (D. Puerto Rico) [Germany] [Rights of Custody]

Antunez-Fernandes v. Connors-Fernandes, 259 F.Supp.2d 800 (N. D. Iowa 2003)  [France] [Joint parental responsibility]
Bader v Kramer, 445 F.3d 346 (4th Cir., 2006) ("Bader I") [Germany] [Presumption of joint custody]

Bader v Kramer, 484 F.3d 666 (4th Cir., 2007) [Exercise Rights of Custody]

Cantor v Cohen, 442 F.3d 196 (4th Cir. 2006)  [ Israel]   [No jurisdiction to enforce rights of Access]

Croll v. Croll
, 229 F.3d 133 (2d Cir.2000)  [Hong Kong] [ne exeat not right of custody]

Doudle v. Gause, 282 F.Supp.2d 922 (N. D. Ind. 2003)   [Austria] [Rights of Custody]

Furnes v Reeves, 362 F.3d 702 (11th Cir., 2004)  [Norway]  [ne exeat right of custody]

Garcia v Angarita, 440 F.Supp.2d 1364 (S.D. Florida, 2006) [Colombia] [patria potestas right of custody]

Giampaolo v. Erneta, 390 F.Supp.2d 1269 (N.D. Georgia, 2004) [Argentina] [Rights of Custody]

Gil v. Rodriguez 184 F.Supp.2d 1221, (M.D. Florida, 2002)  [Venezuela] [patria potestas right of custody]

Gonzalez v. Gutierrez, 311 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2002)    [Mexico] [ne exeat not right of custody]

Hazbun Escaf v. Rodriquez, 200 F.Supp.2d 603 (E. D. Va. 2002)   [Colombia] [Rights of custody]

Hanley v Roy , 485 F.3d 641 (11th Cir. (Fla.) 2007)  [Ireland] [Rights of Custody]

Ibarra v Quintanilla Garcia, 476 F.Supp.2d 630 (S. D. Texas, 2007) [Mexico] [Rights of Custody]

In re DD, 440 F.Supp.2d 1283 (M.D. Florida,2006) [France] [Rights of Custody]

In re Robinson, 983 F. Supp. 1339 (D. Colo. 1997) [United Kingdom] [Rights of Custody]

Kufner v Kufner, 440 F.Supp.2d 491 (D.R.I., 2007)  [Germany] [Rights of Custody]

Lalo v. Malca, 318 F.Supp.2d 1152 (S.D., Florida, 2004) [Panama]  [ne exeat right of custody] [patria potestas right of custody]

Ly v Heu, 296 F.Supp.2d 1009 ( D. Minnesota, 2003) [France ] [No jurisdiction to enforce right of access]

Lynch v Mendez Lynch, 220 F.Supp.2d 1347, ( M.D. Florida, 2002)  [Argentina] [Rights of custody]

Matter of Leslie v. Noble, 377 F.Supp.2d 1232 (S.D. Florida, 2005)  [Belize] [Rights of Custody]

Norden-Powers v. Beveridge, 125 F.Supp.2d 634 (E. D. N. Y. 2000)   [Australia] [Joint parental responsibility]

Pasten v Velasquez, 462 F.Supp.2d 1206 (M.D. Alabama, 2006) [Chile] [Rights of custody]

Pesin v Osorio Rodriguez, 77 F.Supp.2d 1277 ( S.D. Florida, 1999)      [Venezuela] [Rights of Custody]

Pesin v. Rodriguez, 244 F.3d 1250 (11th Cir. 2001)   [Venezuela] [Fugitive disentitlement]

Pielage v McConnell, --- F.3d ----, 2008 WL 399431 (11th Cir. 2008) [Netherlands] [Retention defined]

Roy v Roy, 432 F.Supp.2d 1297 (S.D. Florida, 2006) [Ireland] [Rights of Custody]

Sealed Appellant v Sealed Appellee 394 F.3d 338 (5th Cir.(Tex.) 2004)     [Australia] [Rights of custody]

Shalit v. Coppe, 182 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir., 1999)    [Israel] [Rights of custody]     

Shealy v. Shealy, 295 F.3d 1117 (10th Cir., 2002)  [Germany] [Equal de jure custody]

Teijeiro Fernandez v. Yeager, 121 F.Supp.2d 1118 (W. D. Mich. 2000)  [Spain] [No jurisdiction to enforce right of access]

Walton v. Walton, 925 F. Supp. 453 (S.D. Miss., 1996)  [Australia] [Rights of custody]

Whallon v. Lynn, 230 F.3d 450 (1st Cir. 2000)  [Mexico] [patria potestas right of custody]

Wiezel v Wiezel-Tyrnauer 385 F.Supp.2d 240 (S. D. N. Y., 2005) [No jurisdiction to enforce right of access]

Wiggill v Janicki, 262 F.Supp.2d 687 ( S.D. West Virginia, 2003)   [England] [No jurisdiction to enforce right of access]

Wojcik v. Wojcik, 959 F.Supp.2d 413 (ED. Mich. 1997) [France] [joint custody presumption]

Yang v Tsui, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2006 WL 2466095 (W. D. Pa) [Canada] [Right of Custody]

Yang v Tsui,  416 F.3d 199 (3d Cir.,2005) [Canada]

Yang v Tsui, --- F.3d ----, 2007 WL 2377463 (C.A.3 (Pa.)) [Canada] [Rights of Custody]
 

Go To Top of Page


Wrongful Removal or Retention

Belay v Getachew, 272 F.Supp.2d 553,(D. Md., 2003)  [Sweden]

Diorinou v. Mezitis, 237 F.3d 133 (2d Cir., 2001)  [Greece]

Fabri v. Pritikin-Fabri, 221 F. Supp. 2d 859 (N.D. Ill. 2001) [Italy]

Mozes v Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir, 2001) [Israel]

Shealy v. Shealy, 295 F.3d 1117 (10th Cir. 2002) [Germany]

Toren v. Toren, 191 F.3d 23 (1st Cir. 1999) [Israel]

 

Go To Top of Page

 

Visit Florida Divorce and Family Law

 

Go To Top of Page