In Wojcik v. Wojcik, 959 F.Supp.2d 413 (ED. Mich.
1997), a French father petitioned for the return of his children to
France. The court held that the
settled in environment
exception to automatic return applied even though the father contacted
the United States Central Authority within a year of the wrongful
retention.
The children were born in France, the father was French,
the children had been residing in France continuously until their
removal by the mother, the father was married to the mother and thus
enjoyed the presumption of joint custody under French law, the father
and mother were living together with the children immediately before the
removal, and the father exercised his parental rights before the
children were wrongfully retained in the United States.
The father did not commence proceedings before a
judicial or administrative authority within a year of the mother
s wrongful retention and the
settled in their environment exception to the automatic return of the children applied. No equitable
reason existed to preclude application of
A settled in their environment
exception. The mother did not hide the children and in fact called the
father the first day of the wrongful retention and told the father the
location of the children.
The children, who were eight and five years old at the
time of the hearing, were settled in their new environment. The children
had been in the United States for 18 months. The mother and the children
lived with the mother= s
brother for eight months until they moved to a rented house. The
children attended school or day care consistently and had friends and
relatives in the area. The family attended church regularly, and the
mother had stable employment with the same employer for more than one
year.