"child custody" "child support" New York Family Law"

 

 

 

    [HOME]

                  New York Divorce and Family Law  

      nysdivorce.com    brandeslaw.com

The definitive site on the web for New York Divorce and Family Law.

 

[HOME]

NEW YORK DIVORCE AND FAMILY LAW 

 

[SITE MAP]

ARTICLES  BY SUBJECT

Adoption

Agreements

Alimony, Maintenance and Spousal Support

Child Abuse

Child Abduction

Child Custody and Parental Alienation

Child Support

Child Visitation

Common Law Marriage

Domestic Violence

Degrees and Licenses

Engagement Gifts

Enforcement

Grandparent Visitation and Non-Parent Visitation

Grounds For Divorce

International Child Abduction

Legal Fee Awards and Awards For Expenses

Litigation and Procedure

Marital Property

Property Distribution

Questions About Taxes

Retirement Benefits

Separate Property

Spousal Support

Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act

[HOME]

[SITE MAP]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[ Home | News | Feedback | Search ]

 

Raijmakers-Eghaghe v. Haro, 131 F.Supp.2d 953 (E. D. Mich. 2001)

 

 In Raijmakers-Eghaghe v. Haro, 131 F.Supp.2d 953 (E. D. Mich. 2001), the ex-wife, a Dutch citizen living in the Netherlands, sued ex-husband, an American citizen living in Michigan, seeking the return of the children to the Netherlands. The District Court, held that the ex-husband failed to prove that the children would face a grave risk of physical or psychological harm were they repatriated to the Netherlands, and the genuine issues of material fact precluded summary judgment as to the applicability of ICARA's maturity exception. The court held that it was not precluded, as a matter of law, from taking into account the views of an eight-year-old child under the maturity exception of the International Child Abduction Remedies Act as the Convention contained no age limit for applying this exception.

 

Go To Top of Page