|
In Raijmakers-Eghaghe v. Haro, 131 F.Supp.2d 953
(E. D. Mich. 2001), the ex-wife, a Dutch citizen living in the
Netherlands, sued ex-husband, an American citizen living in Michigan,
seeking the return of the children to the Netherlands. The District
Court, held that the ex-husband failed to prove that the children would
face a grave risk of physical or psychological harm were they
repatriated to the Netherlands, and the genuine issues of material fact
precluded summary judgment as to the applicability of ICARA's maturity
exception. The court held that it was not precluded, as a matter of law,
from taking into account the views of an eight-year-old child under the
maturity exception of the International Child Abduction Remedies Act as
the Convention contained no age limit for applying this exception.
|