|
[HOME]
NEW YORK DIVORCE AND FAMILY LAW
[SITE MAP]
ARTICLES BY SUBJECT
Adoption
Agreements
Alimony, Maintenance and Spousal Support
Child Abuse
Child Abduction
Child Custody
and Parental Alienation
Child
Support
Child Visitation
Common Law Marriage
Domestic Violence
Degrees
and Licenses
Engagement Gifts
Enforcement
Grandparent Visitation and
Non-Parent Visitation
Grounds For Divorce
International Child Abduction
Legal Fee Awards and Awards
For Expenses
Litigation and Procedure
Marital Property
Property
Distribution
Questions About
Taxes
Retirement Benefits
Separate Property
Spousal Support
Uniform Child Custody
Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act
[HOME]
[SITE MAP]
| |
|
[ Home | News | Feedback
| Search ]
|
|
England v. England, 234 F.3d 268 (5th Cir. 2000)
|
|
In England v. England, 234
F.3d 268 (5th Cir. 2000) the Fifth Circuit found that the children of an
American family that had been living in Australia had to be returned to
their father. The court rejected the mother's argument that the children
would be subject to psychological harm if they returned to Australia.
The mother argued that the oldest child, who was adopted, would be
traumatized by returning to the country where she had led an unsettled
life. The court also rejected the mother's argument that the child who
was thirteen was old enough to have her views considered. |
|
Go To Top of Page |
|