"child custody" "child support" New York Family Law"

 

 

 

    [HOME]

                  New York Divorce and Family Law  

      nysdivorce.com    brandeslaw.com

The definitive site on the web for New York Divorce and Family Law.

 

[HOME]

NEW YORK DIVORCE AND FAMILY LAW 

 

[SITE MAP]

ARTICLES  BY SUBJECT

Adoption

Agreements

Alimony, Maintenance and Spousal Support

Child Abuse

Child Abduction

Child Custody and Parental Alienation

Child Support

Child Visitation

Common Law Marriage

Domestic Violence

Degrees and Licenses

Engagement Gifts

Enforcement

Grandparent Visitation and Non-Parent Visitation

Grounds For Divorce

International Child Abduction

Legal Fee Awards and Awards For Expenses

Litigation and Procedure

Marital Property

Property Distribution

Questions About Taxes

Retirement Benefits

Separate Property

Spousal Support

Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act

[HOME]

[SITE MAP]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[ Home | News | Feedback | Search ]

 

England v. England, 234 F.3d 268 (5th Cir. 2000)

 

 In England v. England, 234 F.3d 268 (5th Cir. 2000) the Fifth Circuit found that the children of an American family that had been living in Australia had to be returned to their father. The court rejected the mother's argument that the children would be subject to psychological harm if they returned to Australia. The mother argued that the oldest child, who was adopted, would be traumatized by returning to the country where she had led an unsettled life. The court also rejected the mother's argument that the child who was thirteen was old enough to have her views considered. 

 

Go To Top of Page