"child custody" "child support" New York Family Law"

 

 

 

    [HOME]

                  New York Divorce and Family Law  

      nysdivorce.com    brandeslaw.com

The definitive site on the web for New York Divorce and Family Law.

 

[HOME]

NEW YORK DIVORCE AND FAMILY LAW 

 

[SITE MAP]

ARTICLES  BY SUBJECT

Adoption

Agreements

Alimony, Maintenance and Spousal Support

Child Abuse

Child Abduction

Child Custody and Parental Alienation

Child Support

Child Visitation

Common Law Marriage

Domestic Violence

Degrees and Licenses

Engagement Gifts

Enforcement

Grandparent Visitation and Non-Parent Visitation

Grounds For Divorce

International Child Abduction

Legal Fee Awards and Awards For Expenses

Litigation and Procedure

Marital Property

Property Distribution

Questions About Taxes

Retirement Benefits

Separate Property

Spousal Support

Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act

[HOME]

[SITE MAP]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[ Home | News | Feedback | Search ]

 

Go Back to  Main Menu Library of All Federal Cases and New York State Cases - Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction


Defenses - Table of Cases in this Section

 

 

Anderson v. Acree, 250 F.Supp.2d 876 (S.D. Ohio 2002) [New Zealand] [Wishes of child]

Antunez-Fernandes v. Connors-Fernandes, 259 F.Supp.2d 800 (N. D. Iowa 2003) [France] [Consent]

Baxter v. Baxter, 324 F.Supp.2d 536 (D. Delaware, 2004) [Australia] [Grave risk of harm]

Baxter v. Baxter, ___ F.3d ___, 2005 WL 2233259 (3rd Cir. (Del.)  [Australia] [Grave risk of harm]

Belay v Getachew, 272 F.Supp.2d 553,(D. Md. 2003)  [Sweden]

Blondin v. Dubois, 19 F. Supp. 2d 123 (S. D. N. Y. 1998), judgment vacated, 189 F.3d 240 (2d Cir. 1999) 78 F. Supp. 2d 283, 288-93 (S. D. N. Y. 2000) ("Blondin III"), 238 F.3d 153 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) 2001) ("Blondin IV")  [France] [Grave risk of harm]

Bocquet v Ouzid, 225 F.Supp.2d 1337 (2003)  [France] [Settled in new environment]

Choi v. Kim, ___ F. Supp. ___, 2005 WL 3358473 (S. D. N. Y., 2005)  [Canada] [Consent]

Currier v. Currier, 845 F. Supp. 916 (D.N.H.1994) [Germany][Grave risk of harm]

Danipour v. McLarey, 286 F.3d 1 (1st Cir., 2002) [Sweden] [Grave risk of harm]

DeSilva v Pitts, 481 F.3d 1279 (10th Cir.2007)   [Canada] [Sufficient Age and Maturity]

Didur v Viger, 392 F.Supp.2d 1268 (D. Kansas, 2005) [Canada] [Grave risk of harm]

Didur v Viger, (10th Cir. 2006) No. 05-3440 D.C. No. 05-CV-2188-JWL)  [Canada] [Grave risk of harm]

England v. England, 234 F.3d 268 (5th Cir. 2000)   [Australia] [Grave risk of harm]

Friedrich v. Friedrich, 78 F.3d 1060 (6th Cir. 1996) [Germany] [Grave risk of harm]

Freier v. Freier, 969 F. Supp. 436, 443 (E.D.Mich.1996) [Israel][Grave risk of harm]

Furnes v Reeves, 362 F.3d 702 (11th Cir., 2004) [Norway] [One year limitations]

Gonzalez-Caballero v. Mena, 251 F.3d 789 (9th Cir., Ariz., 2001) [Panama] [Consent]

Hazbun Escaf v. Rodriquez, 200 F.Supp.2d 603 (E. D. Va. 2002)  [Colombia] [Grave risk of harm]

In re Koc, 181 F.Supp.2d 136 (E.D.  N.Y. 2001) [Poland] [Settled in new environment]

In re Robinson, 983 F. Supp. 1339 (D. Colo. 1997)  [United Kingdom] [Settled in new environment]

Ly v. Heu, 296 F.Supp.2d 1009 (D. Minn. 2003) [France] [Settled in new environment]

Locicero v. Lurashi, ___ F. Supp. 2d _____, 2004 WL 1368412 (D. Puerto Rico, 2004)  [Argentina] [Grave risk of harm]

Lynch v Mendez Lynch, 220 F. Supp.2d 1347, ( M.D. Florida, 2002)  [Argentina] [One year limitations]

March v Levine, 136 F. Supp.2d 831, (M.D. Tennessee,2000)  [Mexico] [Grave risk of harm]

Miller v. Miller, 240 F.3d 392 (4th Cir. 2001)  [Canana]

Mozes v. Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2001) [Israel] [Settled in new environment]

Nunez-Escudero v. Tice-Menley, 58 F.3d 374 (8th Cir.1995)  [Mexico] [Grave risk of harm]

Pesin v Osorio Rodriguez, 77 F.Supp.2d 1277 ( S.D. Florida, 1999) [Venezuela]  [Acquiescence]

Pesin v. Rodriguez, 244 F.3d 1250 (11th Cir. 2001) [Venezuela]  [Acquiescence] [Fugitive Disentitlement]

People ex rel. Ron v. Levi, 719 N.Y.S.2d 365 (App. Div. 2001) [Israel]

Raijmakers-Eghaghe v. Haro, 131 F.Supp.2d 953 (E. D. Mich. 2001) [Netherlands] [Grave risk of harm]

Rydder v Rydder, 49 F.3d 369 (8th Cir.,1995) [Poland]  [Grave risk of harm]

Silverman v Silverman, 338 F.3d 886 (8th Cir, 2003) [Israel] [ grave risk of harm]

Tsarbopoulos v Tsarbopoulos, 176 F.Supp.2d 1045 (E. D.
Washington)  [Greece] [Grave risk of harm]

Steffen F. v. Severina P., 966 F.Supp.2d 922 (E. Ariz. 1997)
[Germany] [Grave risk of harm]

In re Walsh, 31 F.Supp.2d 200 (D. Mass. 1998) [Ireland] [Grave risk of harm]

Walsh v. Walsh, 221 F.3d 204 (1st Cir. 2000)  [Ireland] [Grave risk of harm][Germ

Wanninger v. Wanninger, 850 F. Supp. 78 (D. Mass, 1994) 
Whallon v. Lynn, 230, F.3d 450 (1st Cir. (Mass.) 2000)[Germany] [Aquiescense]

Wojcik v. Wojcik, 959 F.Supp.2d 413 (ED. Mich. 1997) [France] [Well settled in new environment]

Yang v Tsui, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2006 WL 2466095 (W. D. Pa) Canada] [Wishes of Child]

  

Go To Top of Page