"child custody" "child support" New York Family Law"

 

 

 

   

                  New York Divorce and Family Law  

      nysdivorce.com    brandeslaw.com

The definitive site on the web for New York Divorce and Family Law.

 

 

[HOME]

[SITE MAP]

ARTICLES  BY SUBJECT

Adoption

Agreements

Alimony, Maintenance and Spousal Support

Child Abuse

Child Abduction

Child Custody and Parental Alienation

Child Support

Child Visitation

Common Law Marriage

Domestic Violence

Degrees and Licenses

Engagement Gifts

Enforcement

Grandparent Visitation and Non-Parent Visitation

Grounds For Divorce

International Child Abduction

Legal Fee Awards and Awards For Expenses

Litigation and Procedure

Marital Property

Property Distribution

Questions About Taxes

Retirement Benefits

Separate Property

Spousal Support

Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ponce v Sanchez, 2011 WL 6820332 (D.Colo.) [Mexico] [Attorney Fees]

 

In Ponce v Sanchez, 2011 WL 6820332 (D.Colo.) Petitioner made a "Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs," after the Court granted Petitioner's "Application for Return of the Minor Children to Petitioner" and ordered Respondent to return the minor child to Mexico. The District Court observed that 42 U.S.C. s 11607(b)(3) provides that "[a]ny court ordering the return of a child brought under section 11603 ... shall order the respondent to pay necessary expenses incurred by or on behalf of the petitioner, ... unless the respondent establishes that such order would be clearly inappropriate. "Despite being advised by the Court that she had one week to respond to any request for attorneys' fees and costs, Respondent did not respond to the motion, and so Respondent failed to establish that granting such relief would be clearly inappropriate. Petitioner's counsel indicates that he represented Petitioner pro bono, and Petitioner was not requesting an award of attorneys' fees. However, Petitioner incurred several costs during the pendency of this case, including a filing fee for the Petition, fees for service of documents on Respondent, and fees for interpreters and translation services. In total, Petitioner asserts that he incurred $1,640.16 in costs. The Court foundthat these requested costs were reasonable and made an order granting the application.
Go To Top of Page